Keywords
attitude
perception
physiotherapy
occupational therapy
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to assess attitudes, mutual perceptions, and knowledge of each other’s professional roles as obtained from occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT) students.
Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out among OT and PT students in a Nigerian university. Fifty-six copies of a revised questionnaire were used as the survey instrument, all of which were returned fully completed. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation, frequencies, and inferential statistics of chi-square tests. Alpha level was set at p<0.05.
Results: Fewer PT students (16.7%) demonstrated good knowledge of the scope of OT, while 64.3% of OT students showed good knowledge of PT. There was a 100% positive attitude from both sets of students towards each other’s profession. 11.9% of the PT and 28.6% of the OT students perceived the two professions as being in direct competition. There was a significant difference between the PT and OT students surveyed in the knowledge of the other profession (χ2 = 11.842, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: More OT students were familiar with PT than PT students with OT. Both OT and PT students declared positive attitudes towards the other profession, with a minority in either group representing the view that the two professions are in direct competition.
References
Definition of occupational therapy. World Federation of Occupational Therapists, 2012, http://www.wfot.org/AboutUs/AboutOccupationalTherapy/DefinitionofOccupational Therapy.aspx
Policy statement: Description of physical therapy. London, UK: World Confederation for Physical Therapy, 2011.
Whitfield T. W. A., Allison I., Laing A., Turner P. A., Perception of the physiotherapy profession: A comparative study. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1996; 12(1): 39–48.
Naidoo N., Buhler L. The perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Physiotherapy and chiropractic students regarding each other’s professional practice. South African Journal of Physiotherapy 2009; 65: 32–38.
Hind M., Norman I., Cooper S., Gill E., Hilton R., Judd P., Jones S. C. Interprofessional perceptions of health care students. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2003; 17(1): 21–34.
Dalley J., Sim J. Nurses’ perceptions of physiotherapists as rehabilitation team members. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15(4): 380–389.
Brussee W. J., Assendelft W. J. J., Breen A. C. Communication between general practitioners and chiropractors. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2001; 24(1): 12–16.
Raosoft Inc. Sample size calculator http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
Puckree T., Harinarain R., Ramdath P., Singh R., Ras, J. Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of final year medical, occupational therapy and sport science students regarding physiotherapy, in KwaZulu Natal. South African Journal of Physiotherapy 2011; 67(3): 19–26.
Lee K., Sheppard L. An investigation into medical students' knowledge and perception of physiotherapy services. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1998; 44(4): 239–245.
Curran V. R., Sharpe D., Forristall J., Flynn K. Attitudes of health sciences students towards interprofessional teamwork and education. Learning in Health and Social Care 2008; 7(3): 146–156.
Alotaibi N., Shayea A., Nadar M., Tariah H. A. Investigation into health science students’ awareness of occupational therapy: Implications for interprofessional education. Journal of Allied Health 2015; 44(1): 3–9.
Mackenzie A., Craik C., Tempest S., Cordingley K., Buckingham I., Hale S. Interprofessional learning in practice: The student experience. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2007; 70(8): 358–361.
Olaoye O. A., Emechete A. A. I., Onigbinde A. T., Mbada C. E. Awareness and Knowledge of Occupational Therapy among Nigerian Medical and Health Sciences Undergraduates. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy 2016; 27: 1–6.
Golledge J. Is there unnecessary duplication of skills between occupational therapists and physiotherapists? British Journal of Occupational therapy 1998; 61(4): 161–162.
Brehm B., Breen P., Brown B., Long L., Smith R., Wall A., Warren N. S. An interdisciplinary approach to introducing professionalism. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2006; 70(4): 81.
Satin D. G. A conceptual framework for working relationships among disciplines and the place of interdisciplinary education and practice: Clarifying muddy waters. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education 1994; 14(3): 3–24.
Agho A. O., John E. B. Occupational therapy and physiotherapy education and workforce in Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa countries. Human Resources for Health 2017; 15(1): 1–7.
Kim Y. J., Radloff J. C., Stokes C. K., Lysaght C. R. Interprofessional education for health science students’ attitudes and readiness to work interprofessionally: a prospective cohort study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2019; 23(4): 337–345.
Kenny D., Adamson B. Medicine and the health professions: issues of dominance, autonomy and authority. Australian Health Review 1992; 15: 319–319.
Botchway H., Quartey J. N. A., Sandra A., Owusu-Ansah B., Ajediran, B. I., Gifty N. G. Effect of Career Information on Knowledge of Physiotherapy Among Science Students in Selected Senior High Schools in Greater Accra. International Journal of Advance Studies in Engineering and Scientific Inventions 2015; 3(1): 76–84.
Saks A. M., Ashforth B. E. A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology 1997; 50(2): 395–426
Chaiken S., Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994; 66(3): 460.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Array